The Analysis Of Forage Production For Ruminant Livestock In Sleman Regency

Main Article Content

almira denaneer

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the analysis of forage production for ruminant in Sleman Regency. The research material used ruminant farmers with a minimum of 1 year of farming experience, as well as secondary data obtained from relevant government agencies, Agriculture and Livestock Department of Sleman Regency. The survey method was conducted in Berbah, Ngemplak, and Minggir District, Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta. The samples used were  98 farmers. The data analysis used descriptive analysis. The result of the research indicate that the average age of farmers was 52.46 years, with 92.86% of them in the productive age range and 7.14% in the non-productive age range. The educational level of farmers consists of 32.65% completing elementary school, 37.76% completing junior high school, and 29.59% completing high school. The main occupations of farmers include 30.61% as livestock farmers, 39.80% as farmers, 11.22% as laborers, 12.24% as entrepreneurs, and 6.12% as business owners. The average farming experience was 17.92 years. The total population of ruminant livestock was 28,656.37 AU, with a feed requirement of 95,139.15 tons/DM/year. Feed production from agricultural waste was 100,475.32 tons/DM/year, and feed production from forage  from paddy fields, dry land, and forest land was 9,516 tons/DM/year. Thus, the total feed production was 109,991.32 tons/DM/year. It was concluded that Sleman Regency in one year could produce 109,991.32 tons (DM) of ruminant animal feed to meet the need for 33,129.92 AU of animal feed. The total population of ruminant livestock is 28,656.37 AU, so it has a potential livestock population increase capacity of 4,473.55 UT. The carrying capacity index value is 1.16 (critical).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Budhijana, R. B. (2023). Pengaruh Unsur Institusional Terhadap Produktivitas Petani Beras dalam Analisa Ekonomi Syariah di Karawang dan Indramayu (Doctoral dissertation, indonesia banking school).

Aldillah, R. (2017). Strategi pengembangan agribisnis jagung di Indonesia. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 15(1), 43-66.

BPS. (2023, Desember 22). Badan Pusat Statistik. Retrieved from Peternakan Dalam Angka 2023.

Elizabeth, R. (2019). Revitalisasi implementasi pemberdayaan kelembagaan pertanian berkesinambungan mendukung pencapaian dayasaing produk olahan. UNES Journal of Scientech Research, 4(1), 52-68.

Eoh, M. (2022). Potensi Limbah Pertanian Tanaman Pangan Sebagai Pakan Ternak Ruminansia Di Kecamatan Seram Utara Timur Seti Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. BIOPENDIX: Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 9(1), 109-117.

Haza, M. B. (2016). Penggemukan sapi (feedlot) dengan menggunakan beta agonis 2 perspektif hukum Islam. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Hidayah, N., & Fitriyah, H. (2023). Pengaruh E-Commerce, Modal Usaha, Ekspektasi Pendapatan, dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Berwirausaha dengan Self-Efficacy Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi-Manajemen-Akuntansi, 19(2), 153-164.

Kalangi, L. S., Lombogia, S. O., & Lumy, T. F. (2016). Analisis Keuntungan Pemeliharaan Ternak Sapi Potong Di Desa Srigonco Kecamatan Bantur Kabupaten Malang Provinsi Jawa Timur. Repository Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Sulawesi Utara: Bank Indonesia Sulawesi Utara.

Pelengkahu, S. S., Kindangen, P., & Walewangko, E. N. (2021). Analisis pengaruh sektor pertanian terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal pembangunan ekonomi dan keuangan daerah, 22(2), 46-66.

Soedjana, T. (2005). Prevalensi usaha ternak tradisional dalam perspektif peningkatan produksi ternak nasional. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 24(1), 10-14.

Sumargo, B. (2020). Teknik sampling. Unj press